01
Model selection
We test hosted models, open-weight models, and small language models on your real examples, and compare them on accuracy, cost, speed, and data sensitivity before you commit.
Getting a language model to answer well in a demo is easy. Getting it to answer correctly, in the right format, at a sensible cost, thousands of times a day, is engineering. Muoro is a large language model development company that does that engineering. We choose the right model, ground it in your data, fine-tune it where it pays off, validate every output, and run it in production with evaluation and monitoring built in. For one client, our fine-tuned model took structural consistency in legal-grade reports from 40% to 98%.
A language model becomes useful when its output can be trusted without a person rewriting it.
A language model becomes useful when its output can be trusted without a person rewriting it.
Most LLM projects use more than one of these. The skill is knowing which problem each one solves.
Most LLM projects use more than one of these. The skill is knowing which problem each one solves.
Prompt engineering | Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) | Fine-tuning | |
|---|---|---|---|
What it changes | The instructions the model receives | The information the model can draw on | The model’s learned behavior |
Best for | Clear tasks a capable model already handles well | Answers that depend on your documents or data that change often | A consistent format, tone, or reasoning style, or a specialized domain |
Data needed | A handful of good examples | A well-organized, permissioned document or data store | A curated set of high-quality examples, often hundreds to thousands |
Effort to update | Edit the prompt | Update the source content | Retrain on new examples |
Main risk | Inconsistent output at scale | Poor retrieval leads to poor answers | Training on weak examples bakes in mistakes |
We cover every layer between a business task and a model running reliably in production.
We cover every layer between a business task and a model running reliably in production.
We test hosted models, open-weight models, and small language models on your real examples, and compare them on accuracy, cost, speed, and data sensitivity before you commit.
Document processing, chunking, embeddings, hybrid search, and re-ranking, with access controls so each user only retrieves what they are allowed to see.
Curated training sets, supervised fine-tuning, and parameter-efficient methods such as LoRA, so the model learns your format, terminology, and reasoning style.
Schemas the model must follow, validators that check facts and citations against approved sources, and rules that route low-confidence output to a person.
Test sets built from real examples, automated scoring for accuracy and format, and human review for the cases automation cannot judge.
Private or cloud deployment, model routing, caching, and monitoring for quality, latency, cost, and drift, with versioned prompts and models.
Large language models help enterprises extract data, generate reports, search internal knowledge, and automate document-heavy workflows.
Large language models help enterprises extract data, generate reports, search internal knowledge, and automate document-heavy workflows.
One method, with a measurable quality bar at every step.
One method, with a measurable quality bar at every step.
Client:A provider of legal-style trademark reports.
The base model wrote in an informal, inconsistent style, and report structure drifted from one output to the next. Some citations were invented or came from the wrong jurisdiction. In legal work, any of those makes a report unusable.
We curated a training set of attorney-written reports and standardized it into templates. We used supervised fine-tuning to teach the model the reasoning style and language of those reports. Every output is held to a five-part schema (context, issue, analysis, citations, and conclusion), and a citation validator rejects any case law that is not on an approved list.
Structural consistency up from 40% to 98% · 90% fewer hallucinated or invalid citations · 1,000+ audit-ready reports shipped every month.
Our engineers work inside your environment, alongside your product, data, and risk teams. We put one LLM use case into production first, and scale only once it is proven.
Our engineers work inside your environment, alongside your product, data, and risk teams. We put one LLM use case into production first, and scale only once it is proven.
Not a pilot or a prototype. We build the first LLM use case in your environment with evaluation, guardrails, and monitoring in place. You get: a working system, measured against the agreed quality bar.
ML, data, and platform engineers extend the work to new use cases on a build, operate, transfer basis. You get: documented models and pipelines, and a team ready to run them.
Retrieval pipelines, evaluation sets, and validators built for the first use case are reused for the next. You get: a shared LLM foundation, owned by your team or run by ours.
We review the task, your data, and your security requirements, and test candidate models on real examples. You get: a recommended approach, a quality bar, and a clear estimate.
Not a pilot or a prototype. We build the first LLM use case in your environment with evaluation, guardrails, and monitoring in place. You get: a working system, measured against the agreed quality bar.
ML, data, and platform engineers extend the work to new use cases on a build, operate, transfer basis. You get: documented models and pipelines, and a team ready to run them.
Retrieval pipelines, evaluation sets, and validators built for the first use case are reused for the next. You get: a shared LLM foundation, owned by your team or run by ours.
We review the task, your data, and your security requirements, and test candidate models on real examples. You get: a recommended approach, a quality bar, and a clear estimate.
Not a pilot or a prototype. We build the first LLM use case in your environment with evaluation, guardrails, and monitoring in place. You get: a working system, measured against the agreed quality bar.
ML, data, and platform engineers extend the work to new use cases on a build, operate, transfer basis. You get: documented models and pipelines, and a team ready to run them.
We build adaptive AI on the platforms you already run, including Databricks (MLflow, Unity Catalog and Delta Lake), Snowflake, AWS, Azure and Google Cloud, with Kafka for streaming data, so there is no new stack to adopt.
We build adaptive AI on the platforms you already run, including Databricks (MLflow, Unity Catalog and Delta Lake), Snowflake, AWS, Azure and Google Cloud, with Kafka for streaming data, so there is no new stack to adopt.
Choose the use cases worth building and plan the path to production.
Explore serviceAI agents that complete multi-step tasks across your systems.
Explore serviceAssistants built into the tools your teams already use.
Explore serviceModels that stay accurate as your data changes.
Explore serviceChoose the use cases worth building and plan the path to production.
Explore serviceAI agents that complete multi-step tasks across your systems.
Explore serviceAssistants built into the tools your teams already use.
Explore serviceModels that stay accurate as your data changes.
Explore serviceChoose the use cases worth building and plan the path to production.
Explore serviceAI agents that complete multi-step tasks across your systems.
Explore serviceAssistants built into the tools your teams already use.
Explore serviceModels that stay accurate as your data changes.
Explore serviceTell us which model has started to slip. Our engineers will review it and show you what an adaptive, fully governed version would look like
Talk to a certified expert